Monday, August 20, 2007

Good For Bikes! Good For Business!

Several years ago, the City of Los Angeles embarked on an ambitious campaign to provide bicycle parking throughout the city in order to encourage cycling as a form of transportation. Cyclists were grateful!

In 2004, the LADOT installed over 800 Inverted U Bike Racks bringing the Citywide total to 2500 bike racks in the City of Los Angeles.

In 2005, the LADOT promised to install another 600 Inverted U Bike Racks, all on city-owned property, usually sidewalks of adequate width. Cyclists were pleased!

Somewhere along the way the Bicycle Parking Program became low priority for the Bikeways Department of the LADOT and the bike racks began collecting dust in a warehouse in Van Nuys. Cyclists didn’t say anything.

In 2006, the Bikeways Coordinator for the LADOT Bikeways Department explained that the Bike Parking Program was on hold because of staffing issues. (The Department consists of a Coordinator, a Lead Engineer and 9 other Engineers!) Cyclists still didn’t say anything.

In 2007, the Bicycle Advisory Committee for the City of Los Angeles met for its regular bimonthly meeting in the Board Room of the DWP Building. Cyclists spoke up!

As part of a ride called “Storm the Bastille” the cyclists gathered at the Santa Monica/Vermont Red Line Station and rode to the BAC meeting, this time prepared to focus their Public Comment energy on the subject of Bike Parking in LA. Representing communities from San Pedro to Highland Park to Hollywood to the San Fernando Valley, the cyclists asked the LADOT to revive the dormant Bike Parking Program. Cyclists called on the LADOT to act!

The City of Los Angeles currently has an average of 6 bike racks per square mile. Cyclists complain that in spite off all the talk, the City has failed to offer the most basic support for the cycling community; safe and secure parking facilities. To make it worse, it’s still illegal to lock your bike to a parking meter in the City of LA.

The Inverted U Rack is simple, it doesn’t take up much room, it’s cheap, it’s effective and it works.

If you’d like to see more of these bike racks in Los Angeles send an email to with the following info:

Name of business:

Contact name:



Street address:

Nearest Cross Street:

LA Council District:
(Council District Map)

If you’d like to know more about Bicycle Parking take a look at the recommendations from the Association of Pedestrian and Bicycle Professionals.

See you on the Streets!

Sunday, August 19, 2007

"The Year Of The Cyclist!" - Halfway

Six months ago, in a fit of “Oh Yeah?” one-upsmanship, I committed to recognizing the “Year of the Cyclist” (Chinese Year 4705) by riding 4705 km during the upcoming year.

Today is the halfway point on that journey and I’m proud to report that so far I’ve ridden 3735.7 kilometers toward my goal of 4705.

It’s been a great year for riding. Because I work with Neighborhood Councils throughout the city, I’ve had the opportunity to ride to the four corners of Los Angeles on a regular basis. I’ve taken long serendipitous tours of neighborhoods from San Pedro to Chatsworth and from West Adams to Eagle Rock, all in the spirit of adventure and discovery.

Along the way, my trusty Marin gave out. I was riding down Vermont one day when I became aware of the Marin’s extremely comfortable ride. In the 5000+ miles I’d put on the Marin, I’d never fully noticed how smooth it rode, especially over a rough road such as Vermont. Then I realized that the amazing flex I experienced in the frame was due to the two significant cracks, one at the seat post and the other at the bottom bracket! I was sad. The Marin served me well.

I replaced the Marin with a LeMans Centurion, rescuing it from its retirement in a dusty garage. I cleaned it up and I think it enjoys being back on the road. I certainly enjoy riding it.

I also built up a nice UniVega frame at the Bicycle Kitchen. This was a first time thing for me. Prior to this, my only experience was reviving or repairing but never starting from scratch. The Kitchen was great and I love riding the UniVega.

And so, as I survey the remainder of the year, I have to admit that the most annoying aspect of my challenge has been the pesky miles-to-kilometers conversion. Grrrr! With so many kilometers under my belt and with so much of Los Angeles yet unexplored, I’m going to give up the Kilometer challenge and up the ante to a Mileage challenge.

As of today, the “Year of the Cyclist” challenge is 4705 miles in the Chinese Year 4705.

At 2321.3 miles on a goal of 4705 I’m all of a sudden behind the pace!

See you on the Streets!

Wednesday, February 21, 2007

How The West(side) Was Won

In 1930 the Sepulveda Boulevard Tunnel opened beneath Mulholland Drive, providing a short cut from the San Fernando Valley to the Westside via the “Sepulveda Pass.”

Shortly thereafter, the first “If you lived here, you’d be home!” sign appeared.

Three quarters of a century later our leadership is still grappling with the problem of moving people vehicles through the Sepulveda Pass. (360,000 vehicles per day!)

The idea of reversible lanes has been floating about for decades. The concept is simple; a dedicated lane that operates during rush hour in the direction with the most traffic. (southbound in the morning and northbound in the evening)

In 2001, the LADOT funded an $11 million “Sepulveda Reversible Lane” project through the MTA’s Call for Projects. The plan called for a 3.5 mile-long reversible lane down the center of Sepulveda Boulevard.

The plan met with huge opposition from both cyclists and residents.

Nobody disputes that the Sepulveda Pass is congested or that it is overwhelmingly directional. Up to nine times more vehicles travel in one direction at rush hour compared to the opposite direction.

At issue was the residents’ claim that an increase in capacity would immediately fill to the same level of gridlock by attracting traffic from the 405. Cyclists argued that the increase in capacity would come at the expense of their safety.

“This plan will actually induce traffic, cause even more congestion and make it virtually impossible for residents in the area to get in and out of their homes,” said Brentwood resident Patricia Bell Hearst.

“The Department of Transportation is putting bicyclists in grave danger by not including a bicycle lane on the southbound side of Sepulveda,” said Aaron Kirsch, a member of the L.A. County Bicycle Coalition.

Ultimately, the project died when City Councilmember Jack Weiss listened to concerns from the stakeholders of the area and then declared his opposition to the project.

Weiss voiced his concern that the project would increase hazards without significant improvement in travel time and then requested that all work on the Sepulveda Reversible Lane project stop.

Almost three years have gone by. The LACBC lists the termination of this project as one of its crowning achievements. Kirsch reports that he and “a host of others worked to kill this project a few years back.”

Everyone involved seems to think the project is dead…

Except for the LADOT. Three years is a long time and $11 million is a lot of money. They have been hard at work. Without a reversible lane element, the DOT can’t use that money on the Sepulveda Pass. Which brings us to the new and improved, LADOT re-scoped…

“Sepulveda Boulevard Reversible Lane, Bike Lane & Intersection Improvement Project.”

The “reversible lane” element is now limited to 1800 feet between Skirball Center Way and Dartford Way and including the tunnel. (1800 feet) The project is now “in the money!”

The “bike lane” element consists of adding a northbound bike lane between Bel Air Crest Road and Skirball Center Drive (1 mile) but no bike lane for the southbound side of Sepulveda. Southbound cyclists get a striping for a wider shoulder “as cyclists traveling downhill at high speeds would be able to merge with traffic…and would not be confined to a designated bike lane.”

Listed as “No Impact” on the Environmental Review Document is the fact that the existing southbound bike lane between the tunnel and Skirball Center Drive would be removed to accommodate a new third southbound traffic lane.

Alleviating peak hour congestion, reducing travel delays, and enhancing safety for recreational and commuter are admirable goals but this project is not the solution.

The funding for the Sepulveda Boulevard improvements is contingent on a “reversible lane” element. Selecting the tunnel as the location for the minimal implementation of the “reversible lane” requirement without providing any accommodations for cyclists is dangerous. At the least, signage and a demand actuated “cyclist in tunnel” warning system would provide some safety support for cyclists in a high conflict area. Anything less is unacceptable.

The City of Los Angeles Transportation Plan designated Sepulveda Boulevard as a Class II Bikeway. Any roadway improvements to this boulevard that do not bring the boulevard up to standard are unacceptable.

The project calls for a Class III Bikeway on the southbound side of Sepulveda which is at odds with the City’s route selection criteria which states that routes should NOT be designated on streets carrying traffic volumes of over 10,000 vehicles daily or with curb lane volumes of over 150 vehicles/hour. Swapping out a Class II Bike Lane for a Class III Bike Route is pure sleight-of-hand and it is unacceptable.

Bike Lanes come in pairs. A Bike Lane on one side only encourages wrong way travel. This is also in violation of the LADOT Bikeways standard. Placing a northbound bike lane between Bel Air Crest and Skirball without a southbound bike lane is unacceptable.

Roadway improvements should be…improvements. Removing a bike lane to accommodate a new third southbound traffic lane is not an improvement and it is unacceptable.

While the logic of not placing restrictive bike lanes on a downhill is established in the MUTCD, expecting cyclists to merge with speeding traffic is simply cavalier and irresponsible. Two cyclists died on PCH last year when they were forced to merge into 50 mph traffic. Unless there are guarantees that vehicular traffic speeds will be restricted on the downhill, this plan is pure folly and it is unacceptable.

The City of Los Angeles claims that the “Sepulveda Boulevard Reversible Lane, Bike Lane & Intersection Improvement Project” will alleviate peak hour congestion (ie. increase capacity), reduce travel delays (ie. speed up traffic), and enhance safety for recreational and commuter bicyclists (all this while removing a bike lane, creating an inconsistent environment and leaving cyclists to fend for themselves in the tunnel without so much as a shoe-horn for assistance or protection.) The LADOT’s plan communicates loudly the place of cyclists on the transportation food chain.

Ah, Attack, Parry, Riposte.


The Environmental Document
is available for a 30-day public review and comment period beginning on Friday, February 16, 2007 and ending on Monday, March 19, 2007.

Monday, February 19, 2007

The Year Of The Cyclist!

A thousand Bicycles shall bloom – Chris Orr

It wasn’t really a challenge and that made it all the more difficult to ignore.

It was simply a statement. A resolution. A New Years Resolution made 5 days before the New Year, no less! Yeah, it was a challenge!

On December 26, 2006 Will Campbell went public with his commitment to pedal 2007 miles during the year 2007.

I thought about it for a bit. I did the math. I put it out my head. I ignored the silent taunting. Before I knew it, it was mid-January.


Saved from the pressure of resolutions and challenges by procrastination.

But it nagged at me. Especially when I racked 335 miles during BikeWinterLA 2007. Aarrrgggghhh.

Then I realized the game was not over.

Today is February 18, 2007. This is the Chinese New Year. Aka the Spring Festival.

This is 4705, the “Year of the Cyclist!”

I am going to celebrate by pedalling 4705 in the year 4705.*

Forty-Seven-Oh-Five in “05” has a nice ring to it!

See you on the streets!

*I’m also gonna be the first one on my block to go metric! 4705 km is equal to 2924 miles.